Strong Support Seen in State For Moving Ahead on New Energy,
Climate Solutions; Coal-Fired Power Plant Moratorium Is
Significant Since MT Has One of Largest Number in the Works.
BILLINGS, MT. & WASHINGTON, D.C.///October 23, 2008/// If
elected officials in Montana and Washington, D.C. are going to
continue investing in energy through subsidies, tax breaks and other
incentives, the focus should shift from oil & gas, coal-fired power
and nuclear power to promoting wind and solar energy, enhanced energy
efficiency, and highly fuel-efficient vehicles, according to a new
survey of 601 Montana adults conducted for TheCLEAN.org and the Civil
Society Institute (CSI) by the leading U.S. survey firm Opinion
Research Corporation (ORC). The CLEAN/CSI survey was released today
with the Billings-based Northern Plains Resource Council.
Key CLEAN/Civil Society Institute survey findings for Montana
include the following:
- Nearly three out of four Montana residents (72 percent) --
including 59 percent of Republicans, 86 percent of Democrats and 72
percent of Independents -- support "ending the state's 13-year-old tax
holiday" for oil and gas producers, which was put in place in 1995
when the price of oil was less than $17 a barrel. It is estimated
that oil and gas companies save $40 million to $60 million annually
because of the tax holiday. Fewer than one in four (24 percent) favor
keeping the tax holiday as is.
- A halt to construction of new coal-fired power plants is
supported by the vast majority of Montana adults. Over two thirds
of respondents in Montana (69 percent) would support "a five-year
moratorium on new coal-fired power plants in the United States if
there was stepped-up investment in clean, safe renewable energy --
such as wind and solar -- and improved home energy-efficiency
standards. The moratorium on new coal-fired power plants is favored
in Montana by 59 percent of Republicans, 83 percent of Democrats and
53 percent of Independents.
- Nearly three out of five Montana residents (56 percent) want
the new President and Congress to seek "independence from foreign
energy primarily (by) promoting energy sources such as wind or solar,
more conservation of energy, and hybrid or other highly fuel-efficient
cars. Only about a third of state residents (35 percent) favor
achieving "independence from foreign energy primarily by promoting
energy sources such as more coal-fired power plants, oil from offshore
drilling and nuclear power." Fewer than one in 10 state residents (7
percent) see no need to change U.S. consumption of foreign
energy.
Beth Kaeding, chair, Northern Plains Resource Council, Billings,
MT., said: "It is good news that the majority of Montanans believe,
like most in the rest of the nation, that it is imperative that we
move forward on energy and global climate issues. Citizens across the
board want our state and national leaders to focus resources and
policies on clean, renewable and alternative energy sources."
Civil Society Institute President and Founder Pam Solo said:
"Montana residents deserve credit for understanding that more
investment by the state and federal governments in coal and nuclear
power is essentially the same thing as investing in subprime
mortgages. If Montana taxpayers are going to directly or indirectly
underwrite energy development and energy-intensive industries --- such
as the auto industry -- we need to insist that state officials in
Montana and the next Congress and President make good, solid
investments that make sense for the long-term of our country. The
only energy investments that rise above the 'subprime' level today are
wind, solar and other clean renewable energy in concert with enhanced
energy efficiency."
Grant Smith, national project coordinator for TheCLEAN.org,
added: "Investments in coal and nuclear power are the Countrywide
Financial subprime mortgages of the energy world. What the public is
saying in this survey is that we support government making investments
in the energy sources of tomorrow, but we have to stop flushing money
down the drain by propping up the failing energy sources of yesterday,
including oil, coal and nuclear. It makes no sense to be making
50-year investments in new coal-fired power plants. Energy efficiency
and renewable technologies already have overtaken, in many instances,
or will soon overtake, in other instances, coal-fired power in terms
of direct cost and are far superior in terms of financial risk,
economic benefit, and the ability address global warming. There is no
viable model under which new nuclear power plants can be constructed
as anything other than multi-billion-dollar public works
boondoggles. After the current financial debacle on Wall Street, it is
hard to imagine that Americans are going to allow more dumb
investments by Montana and Washington on the wrong energy
sources."
Opinion Research Corporation Senior Vice President Wayne Russum
said: "What we see in our survey work is that national and
state-level attitudes about energy and climate action vary relatively
little. In fact, in some respects, the residents of Montana are even
more inclined than other Americans to look beyond coal and other
carbon-based fuels to renewable energy sources."
OTHER KEY FINDINGS
TheCLEAN.org/Civil Society Institute survey conducted by Opinion
Research Corporation also found the following about the views of
Montana residents:
- Only one in 10 Montana residents favor allowing the production
of gasoline or diesel substitutes from coal - also referred to as
"coal to liquids" or "liquid coal" -- to be subsidized "without any
additional environment controls." About two out of five state
residents (39 percent) oppose subsidies for coal to liquids under any
circumstances. About half (48 percent) would permit subsidies "but
only with stringent environmental controls".
- Most Montana residents want to see government aid for wind and
solar power put on the same or better footing than coal-fired and
nuclear power plants. Over half of Montana residents (52 percent)
and the same number nationwide want the government to "evenly divide"
any subsidies, tax breaks or other incentives for new construction
"between nuclear power and coal-fired power plants and energy sources
such as wind and solar." About a third (31 percent) of those in
Montana and 30 percent of Americans would go further, having the
government "shift all or most of them from nuclear power and
coal-fired power plants to energy sources such as wind and solar."
Only 11 percent of those in Montana and one in 10 Americans would
"keep the incentives for nuclear power and coal-fired power the way
they are today."
- Wind and solar are seen by Montana residents as the future of
energy for America. In Montana, 68 percent of respondents see oil
and 56 percent coal as power sources of yesterday. This compares to
more than two out of three Americans who now see coal (70 percent) and
oil (67 percent) as the "power sources of yesterday." By contrast,
solar and wind are seen as "power sources of tomorrow" by 90 and 95
percent of those in Montana and 92 percent and 88 percent of
Americans, respectively.
- Montana residents pick clean energy over coal and nuclear
power. Two out of three Americans and the same percentage of those
in Montana would ask for wind, solar and other renewable energy
technologies if they could "tell your power or utility company where
to get the power to run your house." By contrast, only 8 percent
nationally would pick nuclear power (the same as in Montana) and just
3 percent would pick "coal-generated power" nationally and in
Montana.
- Most Montana residents know that time is running out to deal
with global warming. Three out of five of those in Montana and a
similar proportion of Americans (63 percent) believe that "global
warming is a problem and we have limited time to figure out the
solutions to it.
- Energy issues will figure prominently at the ballot box in
November in Montana. Nine out of 10 respondents in Montana and 91
percent in the nation as a whole say that "the views of candidates on
energy-related issues -- such as gasoline prices, home heating oil
prices, global warming and energy independence" will be important as
they vote in 2008. Of this amount nearly three in five (54 percent in
Montana and 58 percent nationwide) say that energy issues will be
"very important" to how they vote.
Other key findings include the following:
-
The vast majority of those in Montana see a positive or neutral economic impact from dealing with global warming. Fewer than one in five in Montana (15 percent) and the nation as a whole (17 percent) believe that "action on global warming will hurt the U.S. economy," while over half (58 percent in Montana and 51 percent in the US) believe "action on global warming will create new jobs and investment. About a quarter (24 percent in Montana and 28 percent nationwide) say that such action "will neither help nor hurt the economy."
- Today's politicians are not seen as likely to act on climate
issues. Nearly half of those in Montana (45 percent) and 40
percent nationwide, have "only a small degree of confidence" while one
in four have "no confidence" (27 percent in US and 25 percent in
Montana) that "our current elected officials in the United States will
act decisively on global warming issues."
- More than three out of four Americans (78 percent) and slightly more in Montana (80 percent) agree with the following statement: "The effects of global warming require that we take timely and decisive steps for renewable, safe and clean energy sources. We need transitional technologies on our path to energy independence. There are tough choices to be made and tradeoffs. We cannot afford to postpone decisions since there are no perfect options."
- Nine out of ten Montana residents agree with the following statement: "The reliance on fossil fuels is the product of the industrial revolution of the 19th and early 20th centuries. Do you think it is time for our nation to start thinking in terms of the concept of a 'new industrial revolution,' one that is characterized by the orderly phasing out of fossil fuels and the phasing in of clean, renewable energy sources -- many of which are available now, such as wind and solar for electricity, hybrid and clean diesel technologies for cars?"
- More than four out of five Montana residents (85 percent) and the same percentage nationwide do not think "the federal government is doing enough about high energy prices and the U.S. dependence on Middle Eastern energy sources.
For complete survey findings, go to http://theCLEAN.org.
SURVEY METHODOLOGY
The TheCLEAN.org/Civil Society Institute poll conducted by Opinion
Research Corporation's CARAVAN Services was a telephone survey
conducted among a sample of 601 adults (301 men and 300 women) aged 18
and older living in private households in the state of
Montana. Interviewing was completed October 1-5, 2008. The survey was
weighted by age and gender to ensure reliable and accurate
representation of the total population. The margin of error for
surveys with samples of around 600 respondents, at the 95 percent
confidence level, is plus or minus 4 percentage points. Smaller
sub-groups in any survey will have larger error margins.
ABOUT CSI AND THECLEAN.ORG
The nonprofit and nonpartisan Civil Society Institute
(http://www.CivilSocietyInstitute.org) is a think tank that serves as
a catalyst for change by creating problem-solving interactions among
people, and between communities, government and business that can help
to improve society. Since 2003, CSI has conducted more than 20 major
surveys and reports on energy and auto issues, including vehicle
fuel-efficiency standards, consumer demand for hybrids/other
highly-fuel efficient vehicles, global warming and renewable energy.
In addition to being a co-convener of TheCLEAN.org, the Civil Society
Institute also is the parent organization of 40MPG.org
(http://www.40MPG.org) and the Hybrid Owners of America
(http://www.HybridOwnersofAmerica.org).
TheClean.org (http://www.TheCLEAN.org) is a collaborative movement of state and local organizations and individuals who will encourage and support policy makers at all levels of government to implement new energy policies. The Civil Society Institute worked with grassroots organizations across the United States to help organize the TheClean.org campaign.
ABOUT NPRC
For 35 years, the Northern Plains Resource Council has been
committed to organizing Montana citizens to protect our water quality,
family farming and ranching, and our unique quality of life. Visit http://www.northernplains.org
on the Web.
CONTACT: Ailis Aaron Wolf, (703) 276-3266 or
aawolf@hastingsgroup.com.
EDITOR'S NOTE: A streaming audio recording of the related Montana news event will be available on the Web as of 4 p.m. MT/6 p.m. ET on October 23, 2008 at http://www.theclean.org and http://www.civilsocietyinstitute.org.